<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="https://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="https://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>American Foundation for Equal Rights &#187; Iowa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://afer.org/category/blog/iowa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://afer.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Election Recap: Big Wins For Marriage</title>
		<link>https://afer.org/blog/video-election-recap-big-wins-for-marriage/</link>
		<comments>https://afer.org/blog/video-election-recap-big-wins-for-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shumway</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://afer.org/?p=10980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This election brought us an amazing victory. Until now, our opponents have kept pointing out that they&#8217;ve won every popular vote on marriage. But not anymore. With sixteen national surveys showing a majority of Americans support the freedom to marry, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="525" height="300" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dqkFn9hCVjo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>This election brought us an amazing victory. Until now, our opponents have kept pointing out that they&#8217;ve won every popular vote on marriage. But not anymore. With sixteen national surveys showing a majority of Americans support the freedom to marry, their winning streak is at an end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://afer.org/blog/video-election-recap-big-wins-for-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa Judge Targeted For Marriage Equality Decision</title>
		<link>https://afer.org/blog/iowa-judge-targeted-for-marriage-equality-decision/</link>
		<comments>https://afer.org/blog/iowa-judge-targeted-for-marriage-equality-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shumway</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://afer.org/?p=10914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one week, a vote will take place on marriage for gay and lesbian couples in Maine, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington. But those aren&#8217;t the only states where equality and fairness are on the ballot. Voters will also decide the fate of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one week, a vote will take place on marriage for gay and lesbian couples in Maine, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington. But those aren&#8217;t the only states where equality and fairness are on the ballot.</p>
<p>Voters will also decide the fate of Iowa Supreme Court Justice David Wiggins, who was part of the unanimous decision that brought marriage equality to the heartland.</p>
<p>The so-called National Organization for Marriage (NOM) waged an all-out war on the Iowa Supreme Court justices who struck down the state’s ban on marriage for gay and lesbian couples in 2009.</p>
<p>When <a href="https://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20101103/NEWS09/11030390/Iowans-dismiss-three-justices">three justices lost their seats</a> in a 2010 election, it was the first time an Iowa Supreme Court justice lost his or her seat since the current system went into effect in 1962. Funded primarily by radical out-of state groups, the campaigns supporting the justices were outspent by over two to one.</p>
<p>Now Justice Wiggins is being targeted by groups like NOM for his vote for marriage equality.</p>
<p>Current polling is tight. Needing 50 percent to keep his seat, the <a href="https://globegazette.com/news/iowa/wiggins-opponents-trumpet-polling-data/article_6f2176e8-1e68-11e2-a9e0-001a4bcf887a.html?comment_form=true">latest PPP survey</a> indicates 43 percent of Iowans said they would vote “no,” while 37 percent said they would support keeping the justice. A <a href="https://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20121001/NEWS09/310010024/1056/Poll-Nearly-half-Iowans-would-retain-same-sex-marriage-justice-Wiggins">Des Moines Register Iowa Poll released on October 1</a> showed that 41 percent would vote to oust the justice, with 49 percent voting to keep him in office. Nine percent were unsure and 1 percent planned on skipping the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://afer.org/blog/iowa-judge-targeted-for-marriage-equality-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
